Post #135

 Dear Science enthusiasts, what do you think about TIME from the view point of Physics ?

What I feel is that TIME is real. TIME is not a human creation. TIME exist in nature before humans exist or realise it. I will explain it with simple example which any common can understand. I would say TIME is a bye-product of GRAVITY. For eg: Take the example of planets in the solar system. All of them have a fixed rotation TIME and revolution TIME. Aren't those TIME existing in nature without the intervention of humans ? Isn't the earth coming at the same spot after 1 year or rotating and giving exact day and night experience daily regularly ? Can't we see NATURE following TIME here ? Isn't the GRAVITY responsible for these periodic movements of heavenly planets and bodies ? So, it's clearr TIME exist and it's a bye-product of GRAVITY. Humans just found that TIME can be used to manipulate MASS and ENERGY by the realisation of the existence of TIME.

#BT

Post #151 My take on the WHY WAVE FUNCTION COLLAPSES question in Quantum Mechanics.

Why the WAVE FUNCTION COLLAPSES ? This is arguably the most important question yet to be answered in Quantum Mechanics. There are 3 possible answers already existing in the Science world. 

1)Copenhagen Interpretation

2)Quantum Decoherence 

3)Many World's interpretation.

I tried to understand this. And I feel it's the mix of Quantum Decoherence and Many World's interpretation. I have been talking about RESONANCE and OBJECTIVITY-SUBJECTIVITY things for a few years now. What Quantum Decoherence is basically RESONANCE with the environment. Many Worlds interpretation means OBJECTIVE REALITY being interpreted as various answers according the SUBJECTIVE NATURE OF different Observers and Different Environment. 

I am still trying to fully understand this phenomenon. This is a wild guess in the middle of TRIAL and ERROR METHOD while studying Physics.

POST #150 Is this GRAVITY ultimately !?

This is the thought of the day from me that could become the thought of the century. 

STANDARD MODEL couldn’t explain gravity, but could explain other forces.

GRAVITON is not yet found.

NEWTON’s and EINSTEIN’s idea of gravity has MASS as a crucial element in its formulas. 

Do you know what all these means ? Like I updated in my website in the last year or the year before GRAVITY is an effect arising from the working of the other 3 forces. That’s why STANDARD MODEL fails to explain GRAVITY and GRAVITON is not yet a thing. GRAVITY could be a RATIO of MASSES INVOLVED. THATS WHY GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANTS WORK. #BASIL_TALKS 

Post #149 Schrödinger’s cat and frequency

 I previously said Schrödinger’s cat or double slit experiment is about frequency at which the quantum particle vibrates giving the particular result. That is what the poison used in Schrodinger’s cat experiment shows — particular dilution ratio gives 50% alive or 50% dead cat or in other words frequency rate at which quantum particle gives the particular result.

POST #148 RELATIVITY or SOMETHING ELSE ?

 RELATIVITY as a concept is a complex Theory for most of us. What if I say RELATIVITY and it’s related phenomenon can be better described by another concept which is familiar — RESONANCE. What if I say it’s not RELATIVITY, It’s RESONANCE. Different things RESONATES differently To an observer or any other thing under different conditions. RESONANCE has great potential when it’s viewed from a human mind’s point of view, both theoretically and practically. Any concept of RELATIVITY can be better described by RESONANCE. 

POST #147 DIMENSIONS

 To me, if you ask how many dimensions are there, I would say I havent yet figured out what is dimension. I feel that is the question first we need to define first properly. Otherwise, I dont think there would be so much CONCEPTS OF DIMENSIONS like 2D,3D, 4D, 11D, 12D etc make sense to us at the same time. For eg : We were taught there are 3 spatial directions. That means, we can travel in 3 directions and TIME is the 4th dimension because TIME can flow only in one direction. Now, what is confusing me is can we travel in each of those 3 directions avoiding TIME to see TIME and SPACE as seperate concepts or They are parameters to quantify ENERGY? They cant exist as long as there is no energy in the Universe. If you see that way, then the concept of DIMENSIONS is an easy concept to understand and logically stable. So,I would like to see DIMENSIONS AS PARAMETERS TO QUANTIFY ENERGY. So, if we apply TRINARY CONCEPT INTO THE DIMENSIONAL CONCEPT, THERE ARE BACKGROUND DIMENSIONS OR SPATIAL DIMENSIONS, PROCEDURAL DIMENSIONS WHERE ACTIONS TAKE PLACE, THAT IS TIME DIMENSIONS ACCORDING TO THE FORCES CONCERNED AND FRONTLINE DIMENSIONS, WHICH IS THE MATTER LEVEL DIMENSIONS RESULTING FROM THREE LEVELS OF IT, AS MENTIONED BEFORE IN MY WEBSITE.

Post #146 INERTIA OR FORCE ?

So, I learned on Internet that the reason for EARTH's rotation is INERTIA, NOT FORCE.

What if I told you that is not the reason ?

To me/For me, The reason for earth's rotation is FORCE, not INERTIA. We feel it as INERTIA because the FRAME OF REFERENCE of the present spinning EARTH is not the FRAME OF REFERENCE of the EVENT THAT PRODUCED ENOUGH FORCE TO MAKE START THE ROTATION OF EARTH POSSIBLE FROM THE PAST. Just because THE FRAME OF REFERENCE LIES IN THE PAST, ITS NOT RIGHT TO DENY THE BASIC SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLE OF CAUSE AND EFFECT.