POST #147 DIMENSIONS

 To me, if you ask how many dimensions are there, I would say I havent yet figured out what is dimension. I feel that is the question first we need to define first properly. Otherwise, I dont think there would be so much CONCEPTS OF DIMENSIONS like 2D,3D, 4D, 11D, 12D etc make sense to us at the same time. For eg : We were taught there are 3 spatial directions. That means, we can travel in 3 directions and TIME is the 4th dimension because TIME can flow only in one direction. Now, what is confusing me is can we travel in each of those 3 directions avoiding TIME to see TIME and SPACE as seperate concepts or They are parameters to quantify ENERGY? They cant exist as long as there is no energy in the Universe. If you see that way, then the concept of DIMENSIONS is an easy concept to understand and logically stable. So,I would like to see DIMENSIONS AS PARAMETERS TO QUANTIFY ENERGY. So, if we apply TRINARY CONCEPT INTO THE DIMENSIONAL CONCEPT, THERE ARE BACKGROUND DIMENSIONS OR SPATIAL DIMENSIONS, PROCEDURAL DIMENSIONS WHERE ACTIONS TAKE PLACE, THAT IS TIME DIMENSIONS ACCORDING TO THE FORCES CONCERNED AND FRONTLINE DIMENSIONS, WHICH IS THE MATTER LEVEL DIMENSIONS RESULTING FROM THREE LEVELS OF IT, AS MENTIONED BEFORE IN MY WEBSITE.

Post #146 INERTIA OR FORCE ?

So, I learned on Internet that the reason for EARTH's rotation is INERTIA, NOT FORCE.

What if I told you that is not the reason ?

To me/For me, The reason for earth's rotation is FORCE, not INERTIA. We feel it as INERTIA because the FRAME OF REFERENCE of the present spinning EARTH is not the FRAME OF REFERENCE of the EVENT THAT PRODUCED ENOUGH FORCE TO MAKE START THE ROTATION OF EARTH POSSIBLE FROM THE PAST. Just because THE FRAME OF REFERENCE LIES IN THE PAST, ITS NOT RIGHT TO DENY THE BASIC SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLE OF CAUSE AND EFFECT.

 

POST #145 E-F-G AND ITS VARIOUS RATIOS

 ENERGY-FORCE-GRAVITY , IN ITS TRIO STATE CAN CREATE EVERYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE. THE whole universe is ultimately the summation of ENERGY-FORCE-MASS interaction internally at various ratios and externally also in various ratios between each other.

E-F-G can give numerous ratios internally between each other and also various other ratios when these 3 are combined using the 4 basic mathematic symbols of addition,subtraction,multiplication, divsion etc.

Besides these ratios, nature and its creations, both living and non-living, is capable of producing various other ratios through MANIPULATION OF MASS and also through particles or organisms which exist at lower dimensions. So, the above ratios resulting from E-F-G interactions through 4 various MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS again giving rise to more ratios THROUGH PERMUTATION and COMBINATION of E-F-G WITH THE HELP OF 4 BASIC MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS OF ADDITION, SUBTRACTION, MULTIPLICATION AND DIVISION. For eg :

(E+F+G) + (E-F-G) + (E/F/G) + (E*F*G) , THESE 4 RATIOS CAN BE PRODUCED AGAIN WITH SUBTRACTION SYMBOL BETWEEN THEM, AGAIN CAN BE REPRODUCED WITH MULTIPLICATION SYMBOL BETWEEN THEM AND AGAIN CAN BE REPRODUCED WITH DIVISION SYMBOL BETWEEN THEM. THEN AGAIN, THESE 4 RATIOS CAN BE REPRODUCED WITH THE COMBINATION OF 4 BASIC MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS BETWEEN THEM. For eg : 

(E+F+G) + (E-F-G) - (E/F/G) * (E*F*G)

Again more ratios using the SAME THING, but different positions or order, giving MORE RATIOS, DENOTING THE CREATIVE POWER OF NATURE WHICH MAY STILL BE UNCLEAR TO HUMANS WITH LIMITED SENSES, BUT definitely exists in nature or will exist in future or existed back in the past of the UNIVERSE at VARIOUS TEMPERATURES AND DIFFERENT GRAVITATIONAL CAPACITIES ARISING FROM PLANCK'S CONSTANTS TO INFINITE SIZES.

POST #144 TIME,GRAVITY AND DIMENSIONS.

 

TIME is from 2nd dimension. TIME appears as a 3rd dimension phenomenon to humans because humans percieve reality from 3rd dimension.So, it makes sense when we say TIME causes GRAVITY, eventhough it appears to humans as GRAVITY causes TIME. That is what human capacity is.

#BT

POST #143 EARTH'S ROTATION/REVOLUTION AND A HUMAN ON ITS SURFACE

 

Albert Einstein says A person on the earth cannot feel the rotation on the earth because that person is moving at the same speed in relation to the speed of the movement of earth. Two years back I said its not the reason, I said its because the gravitational field of that person is too weak to interact with the gravitational field of earth to give the feeling of rotation. If that is not enough I will give another example . Imagine a ball of 5 centimetre is moving through space at high speed and a small ball of 2 centimetre is sticking to the surface of that 5 centimetre ball. Don't you think that 2 centimetre ball can feel the movement of 5 centimetre ball as both have comparatively similar sizes to have mutually interactive gravitational fields? I think so.

POST #142 GODEL'S INCOMPLETENESS THEOROM AND ITS DEFECTS. A SHORT ANALYSIS BY ME.

 

Isnt Godel's mathematical theorom fundamentally flawed ? It was published in 1931 and seen as a theorom which changed mathematics forever. I think it has fundamental flaws in it to even consider it as serious.

Let me explain. To me, Godel's incompleteness theorom is about SUBJECTIVITY and OBJECTIVITY. IF YOU COULD UNDERSTAND WHICH SENTENCE IS OBJECTIVE AND WHICH IS SUBJECTIVE, IT HAS AN EASY SOLUTION. IT FEELS AS PARADOX WHEN YOU FAIL AT THIS.

Let us look at the theorom.

THIS STATEMENT IS FALSE.

First, we should understand that this sentence has an objective nature. IS THAT TRUE ? IF, SO THAT WOULD MAKE THE STATEMENT FALSE. We are still talking about that objective statement in the first sentence. THEN COMES THE SECOND PART OF THE SENTENCE WHICH IS SUBJECTIVE. -- BUT IF ITS FALSE, THEN THE STATEMENT IS TRUE. -- THERE IS A CONDITION SEEN HERE -- IF ITS FALSE, THEN THE STATEMENT IS TRUE -- THIS IS WHERE SUBJECTIVE NATURE IN THAT STATEMENT IS UNFOLDED. THE VERY FIRST SEMTENCE CAN LIE ON ITS OWN AS IT HAS AN OBJECTIVE NATURE, THE SECOND PART OF THE THEOROM CANT STAND ON ITS OWN AS ITS DEPENDENT ON ANOTHER SENTENCE -- IF ITS FALSE, THEN ITS FALSE. So, what I am saying is that GODEL'S INCOMPLETENESS THEOROM DOESNOT CREATE A PARADOX, Its confusing only when you fail to see Which statement is OBJECTIVE and which statement is SUBJECTIVE.