POST #142 GODEL'S INCOMPLETENESS THEOROM AND ITS DEFECTS. A SHORT ANALYSIS BY ME.

 

Isnt Godel's mathematical theorom fundamentally flawed ? It was published in 1931 and seen as a theorom which changed mathematics forever. I think it has fundamental flaws in it to even consider it as serious.

Let me explain. To me, Godel's incompleteness theorom is about SUBJECTIVITY and OBJECTIVITY. IF YOU COULD UNDERSTAND WHICH SENTENCE IS OBJECTIVE AND WHICH IS SUBJECTIVE, IT HAS AN EASY SOLUTION. IT FEELS AS PARADOX WHEN YOU FAIL AT THIS.

Let us look at the theorom.

THIS STATEMENT IS FALSE.

First, we should understand that this sentence has an objective nature. IS THAT TRUE ? IF, SO THAT WOULD MAKE THE STATEMENT FALSE. We are still talking about that objective statement in the first sentence. THEN COMES THE SECOND PART OF THE SENTENCE WHICH IS SUBJECTIVE. -- BUT IF ITS FALSE, THEN THE STATEMENT IS TRUE. -- THERE IS A CONDITION SEEN HERE -- IF ITS FALSE, THEN THE STATEMENT IS TRUE -- THIS IS WHERE SUBJECTIVE NATURE IN THAT STATEMENT IS UNFOLDED. THE VERY FIRST SEMTENCE CAN LIE ON ITS OWN AS IT HAS AN OBJECTIVE NATURE, THE SECOND PART OF THE THEOROM CANT STAND ON ITS OWN AS ITS DEPENDENT ON ANOTHER SENTENCE -- IF ITS FALSE, THEN ITS FALSE. So, what I am saying is that GODEL'S INCOMPLETENESS THEOROM DOESNOT CREATE A PARADOX, Its confusing only when you fail to see Which statement is OBJECTIVE and which statement is SUBJECTIVE.